Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floating Bellhop

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 18:04, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Floating Bellhop

 * Completing a nomination from July 20. Tagging edit summary was: «could not find any other reference anywhere; seems fake».No vote. Nabla 23:46:54, 2005-08-10 (UTC)


 * Delete or weak merge. I was about to call it a hoax too, but I found one reference on Google groups from 1996.  Certainly doesn't seem like a common term. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  00:05, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, slang definition. Hi Nabla. I think starting a VfD counts as a vote for deletion itself. Furthermore, you could have done a bit of research yourself and cast a vote. It seems strange to reopen a VfD creating more work for everyone. Sdedeo 00:24, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I did not start nor reopen a VfD. I found a VfD tag with no discussion page and not listed here, so I simply completed someone else's nomination. I think that not voting is not unusual in those cases, although sometimes I do also vote. Nabla 00:48:15, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry, misunderstood you. I think you did the right thing. Sdedeo 00:55, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks. Nabla 12:55:12, 2005-08-11 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.