Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floating launch platform


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sea Launch. czar 02:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Floating launch platform

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is nothing but WP:DICDEF. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * comment This could be salvageable if someone added material talking about the subject in general. I have doubts that such a source exists, and that therefore expansion would necessitate WP:OR synthesis of material on the platforms listed. Mangoe (talk) 14:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * On further reflection I'm going with redirect to Sea Launch given that it's the only real example. Mangoe (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Looks like a valid redirect to Sea Launch. Timofei Vatolin (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * KeepI agree with Mangoe - seems a notable concept. I'll take up the challenge and see if I can find anything to add to it. Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect - The only existing floating launch platform is Sea Launch. Until another comes into existence, a redirect should be all there is. SpaceX has a floating landing platform. Blue Origin also plans only a landing platform. Tercer (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The nomination is erroneous as this article is nothing like a dictionary definition. WP:DICDEF actually explains the difference and mistake: "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written...". Andrew🐉(talk) 11:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sea Launch per . XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sea Launch: per above reasons  // Timothy ::  talk  17:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.