Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flockers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 19:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Flockers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NGAME and WP:GNG. Attempted PROD but author removed template. Dr Strauss  talk  19:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep— Searching "Flockers" shows up actual results for the game. While Flockers isn't as popular as Team17's games, it is still popular enough to be recognized by avid Team17 fans, or people on Steam. Coolcam6578 (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The WP:VG/RS search pops up quite a few reviews: Eurogamer, HardcoreGamer, DigitalSpy, Gamezebo, and more than a few announcements. There may be others but I can't review since I'm at work and their titles don't jump out as being reviews. This one clearly meets the WP:GNG. --Izno (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per Izno; the reviews he has found demonstrate notability. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Izno, passes GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG and WP:NGAME. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.