Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Flog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Meanings are mostly dictionary definitions or abbreviations (which the target article does not include the abbreviation). It should be redirected to Flagellation which will have a hatnote to Glossary_of_blogging. GZWDer (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Agree Almost none of the options are links to relevant pages. Not voting "Delete" per se since you're asking for a content change, not a removal. Jergling (talk) 15:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. Flagellation is easily the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, and the only other legitimate usage in Wikipedia (remember WP:NOTDIC) would be at Glossary of blogging. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, albeit with massive cleanup. I was going to say redirect to Flagellation, but I noticed Flogger (another disambiguation page) as well as the glossary item. Therefore, I recommend rewriting the DAB page to point at Flagellation, Glossary of blogging, and Flogger. Alternately, you could consider redirecting and adding two hatnotes at Flagellation. Cnilep (talk) 04:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed the slang definitions and other bullets not appropriate for a disambiguation page. There are still four arguably ambiguous items, though: Flagellation, Fake blog, and Glossary of blogging, plus a blog by Felicia Day called The Flog. Cnilep (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep 4 valid entries, with articles or meeting MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 10:26, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Some are weak (an article about a celebrity who writes a blog that's mentioned in passing in the article for example), but it seems like a valid dab. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.