Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floopy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Floopy
Delete neologism: Wikipedia is WP:NOT a dictionary of fictional made-up words. No sources so we can't verify that this is "widely used" by Friends fans, as claimed. Even if it was widely used, that doesn't make it notable. Prod removed, so bringing it to AfD Gwernol 15:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, non-notable, no citation to verify the very questionable claim that it's "mainly used" at all. Tempshill 16:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable Friendsism (and even if it were notable, isn't anything more than a dictdef). It might merit a mention on the Friends article. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 16:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete useless.  --nathanbeach   16:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Friends. There's no reason that this wisdom and recollection of good times should be lost. --ForbiddenWord 16:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this article and do not create a redirect, but yes, I think it could warrant a line in the Friends article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a slang and idiom guide. Travislangley 21:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism, too floopy for its own article or even a mention in the Friends article. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 23:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.