Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flora Consult


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 21:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Flora Consult

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable floral company CorporateM (Talk) 18:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I appreciate the author's efforts to create an article but I can't see anything that makes this company notable. Google News searches found an Econonic Times article and the other article currently being used as a reference here. Google Books also found one result here (first result form the top) which appears to be a business directory. One of my other Google Books searches found another result here (vague preview but doesn't appear to be significant) along with the first one I found. As a precaution, I performed some more searches including the alternative spelling of Praveen, "Pravin", but found nothing. There isn't even much to indicate local notability but then again floral companies aren't always notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete -Self Promotional article. Wikipedia is not the stage to advertise companies for marketing purpose. Jussychoulex (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely lacking in depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.