Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Reeves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Florence Reeves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of the type of sustained coverage that would meet the guidelines at WP:N; most of what is here and findable online is routine coverage, obituaries that do not establish notability or confirm any claim that her career outside of longevity was notable. There's no Wikipedia policy or consensus that states that the oldest anything is automatically notable by the encyclopedia's standards; numerous AfDs on the "oldest" individuals have been kept or deleted based on their individual merits. Thus we default to the general notability guidelines and any material of encyclopedic merit here can be included on the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian  Paul  20:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and/or Redirect to List of British supercentenarians where she is listed per WP:NOPAGE and the guidelines at the WP:WOP Wikiproject. Non-notable and no significant coverage in sources. CommanderLinx (talk) 10:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of sustained coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.