Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Sellers Coxe Paul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For either notability or copyright reasons, as the arguments here justify a deletion for either reason. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Florence Sellers Coxe Paul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot figure out what she is supposed to be notable for. All of the references refer to her in the primary context of other people. WP is not Who's Who.  DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find a bit more information (she divorced her second husband), but all the newspaper coverage is short reports of weddings, deaths, divorce, etc. There is no significant coverage, no profiles of her, in Newspapers.com, Ebsco, Jstor or Google that I can find. The portrait of her is already in the article about Ida Waugh. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a presumptive copyright violation; the author was blocked for an extensive history of copyright infringement. MER-C 15:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't see a hook for a claim of notability per WP:GNG. WCM email 18:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless someone can explain why she should have an article here – the actions and achievements that make her notable by our standards. The present article consists of routine coverage of ordinary events in an ordinary life, flavoured with extensive off-topic digressions ("Her father was chairman of the Fairmount Park Commission" etc). Please note that if the article is kept, all text added by the article creator will need to be presumptively removed – please see Contributor copyright investigations/Elisa.rolle. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no WP:Copyright violation here, so forget that, but there is no WP:Notability either. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.