Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florencio Rojas (tattoo artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Florencio Rojas (tattoo artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article on a tattoo artist is sourced mainly from interviews. Being primary sources, they don't help us establish his notability. I've conducted a search and found no secondary coverage of him that could be classed as reliable, significant, and independent. I believe he doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete none of the source are independent and reliable. Vexations (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is a blog interview that does not count toward notability. The interview in the magazine - can't assess it. His book is included in databases but I found no independent media reviews. So even if the second interview contains a lot of independent information (doubt it plus a niche source), Rojas would not pass the WP:GNG based on what I found. I'm open to new sources. gidonb (talk) 06:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.