Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Bible Christian School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Florida Bible Christian School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While the school is closed, it existed during the internet era during which sourcing should be online. What I have found is limited to directories of christian schools (such as this and review sites. Nothing in depth.

I can find no evidence this school meets notability requirements. Joshua Henry was an alumnus, but that is a passing mention of the school and there are a handful of others, but notable alumni don't confer it upton the school. Star  Mississippi  17:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  Parlez Moi 22:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity,  and Florida.  Star   Mississippi  17:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see a lot of coverage for its baseball team. StAnselm (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment -- We normally allow articles on High Schools to exist. Notability is not temporary.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I've seen that for public schools as coverage seems more likely to exist, but less so for K-12 private/religious schools. Notability isn't temporary, but in this case I can't find evidence it ever attained it. Star   Mississippi  03:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , High schools have not had any presumption of notability for 4 years. A public or not for profit private school must meet meet GNG; a for profit school must meet NCORP like any other business. And although notability isn't temporary, a change in our standards for notability are generally treated retroactively. 174.212.227.246 (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a thorough BEFORE on this and PROD'ed the article. The baseball team story is tangential, and the only thing that really shows up. As far as notability not being temporary, that guideline states "While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, an article may be proposed for deletion months or even years after its creation, or recreated whenever new evidence supports its existence as a standalone article." That is the case with secondary schools. They once got a free pass if they existed, but by consensus must now pass GNG or NCORP in order to be considered WP:N. This school doesn't have the WP:SIGCOV required.Jacona (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep There is no evidence of notability by Google search. Nonetheless, public schools should have notability unlike private school that must attain media coverage.Gartuwaso (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a private school.... Jacona (talk) 23:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No any evidence of notability. It's a private school and has no any independent source. Gingie11 (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Coverage of the school's baseball team is not transferable to the school itself as notability is not inherited. Futher local coverage of school sports is WP:ROUTINE coverage. There's nothing here that addresses the topic of the school itself "directly and in detail".4meter4 (talk) 15:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No, this isn't about transferring notability at all. The baseball team is part of the school. If the baseball team is notable, then the school is notable. StAnselm (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I disagree. WP:ROUTINE specifically mentions sports matches as routine coverage. School athletics is covered in local press as a matter of course, and there is a reason why we have that specifically under that guideline. Further, that coverage does not address the topic of the school itself (it's history and notability as a school), which is supposed to be the primary subject of this article. One would assume the primary purpose of this school is to educate its students in academic subjects, not athletics, yet we have no SIGCOV of the institutions primary purpose or its history as an organization.4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.