Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida State University London


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Florida State University. Tone 11:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Florida State University London

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is very much written like an advertisement (although this can be fixed), yet I'm not sure that it satisfies the criteria for notability, being a London-based FSU study center. Your thoughts? Cheers,    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 14:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes it does seem like an advert IJA (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I've toned down some of the blatant advertising in the article. It still is a field campus of a very notable accredited post-secondary university.  If it was just a building with no distinction on the FSU campus I'd likely vote delete, but this is a whole separate campus in a different country.--Oakshade (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with their other remote sites, either in the main article or a separate article about the remote locations.    DGG ( talk ) 17:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge as per DGG. Not notable enough for its own article. Reads like advertising. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect until and if someone finds something encyclopaedic to write about it. The current content is more like what you'd expect in a prospectus. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note from nominator: I have no opposition to merge, it sounds like the best solution to me.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 18:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge -- A row of houses in Bloomsbury does not sound to me like a large establishment, certainly not one to warrant the existence of a free-standing article. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.