Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow-driven programming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Flow-driven programming

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Flow-driven programming" as a term doesn't appear to exist outside of its Wikipedia page. May be a synonym of imperative programming or procedural programming. WalterGR 14:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. L337 kybldmstr 23:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I should probably expand upon my rationale for deletion. Google returns ~50 results for "flow-driven programming," which fall among 3 categories: 1. links to/copies of this article, 2. references to this article, 3. unrelated items (e.g. discussions of "dataflow driven programming".)  So this article fails WP:NOT.  It has been marked as needing citations since Jan 2007.  See also Talk:Flow-driven_programming, where the legitimacy of the article is questioned. WalterGR 01:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WalterGR. There's even less evidence for this on Google scholar (one dataflow, one something about medical airflow, and one something about concurrent hardware design, all obviously unrelated to the supposed subject of this article). —David Eppstein 04:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.