Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlowFighting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

FlowFighting
Contested prod, so bringing it to AfD. Yet another attempt by B-ham to advertise for RMAX and Scott Sonnon. The bulk of this entry seems like original research, with no indication of notability. fbb_fan 04:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is non-notable and total nonsense. Opabinia regalis 04:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Looking for an excuse to speedy it. MER-C 04:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No reasonable way to speedy this article; the original PROD was removed by the author with dubious claims as-to notability but it is original research regarding a non-notable martial arts style. (aeropagitica) 07:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article reads like a marketing advertisement. /Blaxthos 12:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Everything looks great and others similar to this have been in existence for years without dispute such as PraMek; Scott Sonnon is an international champion of two different martial art combat sports, a USA National Team Coach, and hall of fame inductee whose thousands of students and gyms worldwide include implementation branchwide in US ARMY. /B-ham 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. This AfD is about FlowFighting, not Scott Sonnon.  And as has been mentioned to you in previous AfD discussions, it should not be assumed that the existence of other entries (that you regard as similar) sets any precedent or standard.  Also, as has also been mentioned to you previously, it is considered proper AfD etiquette to indicate if you are the primary author of the article in question. fbb_fan 16:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as an advert. Dekimasu 10:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.