Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd of Rosedale

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 08:44, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Floyd of Rosedale
A trophy contested in one football match between two universities doesn't seem notable to me. Maybe it could be merged somewhere, but it probably isn't worth it. David Johnson [ T|C ] 20:28, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) Capitalistroadster 05:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A 70 year old trophy passed between two very notable football teams is notable. Stuff like this adds a lot of depth to Wikipedia. Well researched, too. Merging it somewhere would be unacceptable, as it is large enough to clutter any related article. Also, there is no good non-biased placed I can think of to merge it. I'll clean it up and Wikify it, it will look a lot better-Casito&#8669;Talk 22:12, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep There are other articles about similar trophies. Rmhermen 22:55, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Important local sporting tradition in midwest. Well done Casito for the rewrite.
 * Keep. It's an obscure piece of regional culture/tradition, worth hanging on to.
 * keep per Capitalistroadster 05:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)  &mdash;msh210 17:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. While this might not be included in a traditional paper encyclopedia, it is the sort of article that adds value to Wikipedia. --NormanEinstein 14:17, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This trophy has historical value to both the schools and the Big Ten, and to the states as well.  Frank12


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.