Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flubit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Flubit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Shameless commercial self-promotion by SPA. Small amount of coverage in niche publications. Far short of what I'd consider significant in order to meet the most basic WP:GNG criteria. The company's following on social media etc supports the argument that it is a small company with a relatively insignificant following that is using this page to give it further credence. Rayman60 (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No real references as most cite confirm its existence and is the usual churnalism mentions. If references could be found it would be a rewrite and/or heavy copyedit.  scope_creep Talk  10:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.