Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flucidity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy as db-author, as noted below. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Flucidity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Scientific theory with no mainstream acceptance verifiable sources. Pak21 08:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. There are lots of theories with no mainstream scientific acceptance that have their own articles. This fails WP:NFT notability tests.  Every reference I found was a cut-and-paste of the same text.  -Selket Talk 08:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair point well made. I have amended the rationale for deletion. Cheers --Pak21 08:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with the decision to remove the article from Wikipedia, though I was the one who added it. Though it is obviously B.S., its merit lies in the likelihood of common-sense insight coming to the surface due to the copious amounts of ambiguity inherent in the system.  However there are many other, better-established systems which operate on the same principle and can be used for many of the same purposes (feng shui, for example).  It is redundant, for this reason I support its deletion. RW 09:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.