Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluenz (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Fluenz (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article appears to be on a non-notable software company. There does appear to be one review done by the Associated Press, which has been reprinted in several newspapers. However, it is just one single review. The article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  19:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating Fluenz (software), as it also appears to fail the general notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  19:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete both. I found one review for the software, not enough. Found nothing about the company. BTW "Fluenz" is also the name of a car and a flu vaccine! --MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CORP. A company/product review doesn't make it notable. Fluenz (software) should be nominated for deletion as well. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 14:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.