Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluff in Brooklyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Fluff in Brooklyn
Article does not pass WP:WEB and should be deleted. A thorough Google seach turns up thousands of hits for hundreds of profiles and directory listings, but no non-trivial independent coverage (quick mentions in blogs I'm counting as "trivial"). Among those directories, profiles, and blog links, the overwhelming majority are not even about the comic, but rather the related podcast. For background, the article appears to be a vanity creation by the webcomic's creator, judging by the contributions of the account and IPs involved:, , , , and the licensing tag on the image in the article (Image:Island9modified.jpg). It is also effectively an orphan article, as it is only linked to from the articles of a small collective of affiliated comics, and the linking all appears to have been done by the above user and IPs. Wikipedia is not for advertising is a principle that applies. &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 20:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom and the new db-web CSD A7 rules; otherwise, delete the old fashioned way. --Aaron 23:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete webspam; speedy if possible. Opabinia regalis 00:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above and my original PROD ("[n]on-notable web comic. No third-party WP:RS indicating notability. Fails WP:WEB; Alexa rank 3,438,073."). -- Kinu t /c  01:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fluffcruft. Anomo 00:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.