Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flugdienst Fehlhaber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 22:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Flugdienst Fehlhaber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This flight school (maybe even an airline) fails the general notability guidline, and therefore also WP:CORP. It has not been the subject of any significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. It seems to have been a family business without any notable customers. Clearly, this company did not make a sufficient impact on the aviation industry to justify a stand-alone Wikipedia article. FoxyOrange (talk) 08:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 06:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - on balance, I think FoxyOrange is correct in his/her reasoning. Deb (talk) 14:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.