Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flugpo.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Next time, it will be re-created it will be salted.--JForget 02:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Flugpo.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable web company / social marketplace. Article centers around a vaguely advertising-sounding description of the company, and then lists some planned future features. No reliable ghits found, and 0 found through google news. B figura (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as reads like spammy advertorial. --Gavin Collins 09:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator !voting to delete on grounds of failing WP:CORP/WP:WEB, and possibly WP:SOAP.  B figura  (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Bfigura. --RucasHost 05:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A quick google search shows up very few hits for this website. It is also impossible to verify the contents of this subject from third-party reliable sources as well. Fails WP:WEB as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 06:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn company, and a spammy tone to boot, written in a style only a marketer could love: "Flugpo similarly embraces the reality that each community is unique and therefore has different needs." Gosh, and up 'til now I'd assumed all communities were the same. Thanks, spammy article, for showing me the way! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per all above. GlassCobra 18:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.  -- Gavin Collins 09:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Non-notable vanity website. Keb25 10:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.