Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluori-Methane (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 02:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Fluori-Methane
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I did support keeping this article in its first AfD, but after looking over it again, I think that the coverage is inadequate to warrant an article on this spray. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seems to fail general notability guidelines. What it does isn't notable, nor is the company who makes it. Leo 04:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Content is limited to "Dichlorodifluoromethane 15%, Trichloromonofluoromethane 85%". It was kept last time only because there was a belief that it would be made into an encyclopedic article, although most of the suggested-but-not-taken sources seemed to be about the class that this falls under.  So far as I can see, we have no article about vapocoolant sprays (and I'm not volunteering to write one), but there's enough information for one. .  Mandsford 14:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication that this is a notable item. No sources to show or support notability.  WP is not a product directory. Geozapf (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Nergaal (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.