Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flutterby Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Flutterby Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources for a standalone article on Wikipedia; fails WP:GNG, WP:CORPDEPTH. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete — I agree with the nominator: this company fails WP:CORPDEPTH as well as WP:GNG. I found virtually zero reliable coverage beyond passing mention. JFHJr (㊟) 14:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely unreferenced. If the article is significantly improved, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.