Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluxblog

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, but cleanup (adding cleanup tag). -- BD2412 talk 04:33, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Fluxblog

 * Listing nomination from Aug 8. No vote. Nabla 23:59:01, 2005-08-10 (UTC)


 * DELETE: facts and title are nonsensical. (by WillC 2005-08-08 19:09:36)
 * Keep and tag for improvement 133,000 google hits (excluding itself) and a mention in the New York Times and Spin strikes me as both notability and verifiability.  On the other hand, the article should actually tell us something -- what did the NYTimes and Spin say? Robert A West 15:05, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * rewrite May be nonsensicle but some truth. Rewrite- otherwise delete.
 * Keep as per Robert A West. -  BanyanTree 18:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and definitively tag for improvement. If we decide to delete this article, however, we should nominate Matthew Perpetua for deletion as well. — Hillel 11:46, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.