Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Casual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Fly Casual

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like a non-notable company that fails WP:NCORP. Discogs notes on 21 records published, and I can't find any third party sources discussing the company in any detail whatsoever. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    14:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Unsourced and unnotable. –eggofreasontalk 19:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * There are only 7 noted Discogs releases under Fly Casual Recordings. This now defunct Electronic label is not to be confused with 'Fly Casual Records', a hip-hop label. MrDachshund99 (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle  (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.