Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly Hornbill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  11:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Fly Hornbill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  18:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication of notability because there is virtually no coverage in independent reliable sources. There is only one acceptable independent source that covers this: . But this is not enough to demonstrate notability. Agree with nom fails GNG and NCORP. This is probably wp:too soon, having only been established in 2016 as a small airline (read source). Steve Quinn (talk) 06:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - a news search brought up nothing. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.