Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Bigfoot of Florida


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Flying Bigfoot of Florida

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, no real claim to notability. DreamGuy (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is about sightings of a fictitious critter described in the title.  Claims newspaper and media appearances, but Google News knoweth them not.  Likely hoax article about a fictitious hoax; now that's what I call meta! (Or maybe mota.) - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No references, no indication this is a real hoax (for lack of a less oxymoronic turn of phrase). Simonm223 (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hmm.  There's a ton of press out there about bigfoot type sightings in florida, e.g.,, , , , .  Don't know if there's enough to allow this one a separate article, but it doesn't seem to be a hoax about a hoax.--Milowent (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Bigfoot has some presence in pretty near every state, with a fairly large number of them in Ohio, it seems, although Florida seems well infested too.  But unlike the ordinary Bigfeet you see elsewhere, this one can fly.  Bigfoot is fairly clearly notable.  The subspecies endowed with flight?  Not so much yet. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete what Ihcoyc said. Chutznik (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.