Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Tiger Development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Flying Tiger Development

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable videogame development company, seemingly, from the limited information I have found, a subcontractor the actual studio hires for certain tasks such as localization. The entire article's sources list consists of links to the company's website and IMDb, and I've been unable to find adequate sourcing to write a better article, so don't think it can be done (feel free to prove me wrong though, I may have missed something!). Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 14:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Toys,  and Companies. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 14:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The company actually has a history of developing games back in the day, including Time Crisis Alpha for the PlayStation and an old King of the Hill game – but none of this adds up to any kind of notable press coverage. A passing mention at IGN and small one in Kotaku  were the only truly reliable ones that popped up, and I don't think it passes WP:CORP.  Nomader  ( talk ) 16:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Does not even fit WP:ORGSIG, with little to no coverage in independent sources as well as the lack of independent sources available. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.