Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Too High


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Flying Too High

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence for meeting WP:BOOK. Perhaps an article on the series would be a good solution. In any case, thisuch discussion of plot is inappropriate,  DGG ( talk ) 01:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Below is some of the places this book has been reviewed. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - in addition to the above, a NLA Trove search reveals some further reviews. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 02:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * According to AustLit, (login needed) there are around 12 reviews available. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * According to AustLit, (login needed) there are around 12 reviews available. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * According to AustLit, (login needed) there are around 12 reviews available. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.