Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying saucer (pet equipment)




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 20:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Flying saucer (pet equipment)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Currently, the article has no sources because I deleted the two that were there because they were both blogs. A Google search for "flying saucer pet equipment" yield nothing but blogs and e-commerce sites. Mucube (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Products.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I mean it's a thing, they have sales listings on ebay and stuff. No sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur - I see nothing but ads for these; no RS. Lamona (talk) 01:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete : seems like pretty blatant PROMO to me. MurrayGreshler (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO and the fact there are not really any reliable sources discussing this at all. The author has also been blocked for disruptive editing. Bungle (talk • contribs) 10:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a notable but I found zero RS. I did a deep dive and could not come up with any. If someone finds RS an article can be written. Bruxton (talk) 16:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.