Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fobos-Grunt 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Fobos-Grunt. Black Kite (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Fobos-Grunt 2

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is based entirely on speculation; a replacement for the Fobos-Grunt spacecraft is not currently under development, nor is a proposal being seriously considered. Until there is something concrete about this mission, it is not notable enough to have an article on.  W.  D.   Graham  11:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * What about the project website of Fobos-Grunt? This may be the website for Fobos-Grunt 2 in the future. If not, why don't redirect it to Fobos-Grunt? 115.133.209.199 (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - User 115.133.209.199 (aka. Starkiller88)'s POV on the repeat mission disgrees with the outcome reached by Roscosmos. After many years of "contributing" to Wikipedia, he has not understood the concept of restraining his WP:POV. All his arguments, as well as this article hinge on "maybe".  Roscosmos made a decision and it is not in favor of a Fobos-Grunt 2. BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm sorry. Now I agree. I'm foreseeing since February that Fobos-Grunt will not be repeated. 115.133.222.87 (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Fobos-Grunt - any details on the failed proposal for a follow-on mission can be covered in the main mission's article. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as above. Valid search term. Fair sourcing can add to the main article. BusterD (talk) 11:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.