Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FogBugz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

FogBugz
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure.  N F 24 (radio me!) 23:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Advert Hu12 (talk) 23:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote KEEP, although the article could do with a good "de-fluffing". It's generally on any list of "the top contenders" in its field. e.g http://www.software-pointers.com/en-defecttracking-tools.html and http://ims.co.nz/blog/archive/2005/02/13/374.aspx and http://ask.metafilter.com/44377/Best-ticket-tracking-packages.Snori (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Numerous Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News Archive results. It's a top bug-tracking package and even has an entire book written about setting it up. --Dhartung | Talk 01:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Snori. Greswik (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.