Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Folklore Museum of Velventos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Folklore Museum of Velventos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that this is WP:NOTABLE. I could find proof that it exists but nothing to indicate it can meet our guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep Contains a set of reliable secondary sources. A simple google search indicates a dozen websites dedicated to this museum. JAG UAR   16:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment There are websites that mention its existence, yes, but its notability? Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jaguar. When dealing with museums in non-English-speaking nations, it is going to be more difficult to source.   Montanabw (talk)  02:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - News returns zero hits. As do Newspapers, Books, Scholar, Highbeam and JSTOR. In fact, this is one of the few AfD submissions I've seen where there have been zero hits across all the search engines. A simple web search does show that the museum exists, but there isn't a single in-depth article about it there, either, so it fails both WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Believing that there are sources out there which are difficult to find doesn't mean they exist. According to policy, this should be deleted.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - I found nothing reliable even with four different online searches. Bearian (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.