Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Following Philo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Following Philo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book on Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and early Christianity written by P.J. Gott and Logan Licht. Proposed for deletion by User:Reddogsix ("Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK"); this was contested on talk page by the article's creator ("I think the page for this book should [not] be deleted because the book is quoted in other Wiki articles (such as Caenis and that for the Essenes) and overall, it's a very good and very well-researched book, that will have a couple of follow-ups."). (Note that a single-purpose account has added references to the authors' works to these articles, and I am currently removing them.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm wrong for replying in here:
 * Commment

First, thank you for answering and thank you for moving it to this debate section! Also, sorry about the Freudian slip, I must have been a bit sleepy.

The book references in other articles were written about a month before I wrote that article so I thought it'd be oK to include the articles in the "see also" section! Sorry if I made a mistake in that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawanyh432 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, only published a month ago, no sales figures, fails WP:NOTBOOK, WP:Too soon and obvious undeclared COI editing including SPAs Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It isnt even in world cat. It seems not to have been published by any recognized publisher.  DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are not even any minimal signs a better notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.