Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fominskiy Leonid Pavlovich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 13:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Fominskiy Leonid Pavlovich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fail to meet WP:NACADEMICS notability criteria. Wide activities converging of being pseudoscientific, the only peer-reviewed publications are outdated (JETP Lett., 21 2 121, 1975 and another of 1978). BTW, the article in Ru:Wiki was deleted on 20.8.2012 with the similar reasons. Hardman Feidlimid (talk) 08:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - There may be some meat on the bone here, but there is so much hyperbole, such as winning Order of Saint Stanislaus, which in fact they quit awarding before he was born. I think the article is being used as a memorial type page, something we don't do here. I removed the CSD tag two years ago when it was a shell of what it is now, as it didn't meet CSD#A7, but this has turned into a bloody mess that is beyond redemption, even if he were notable, which it doesn't seem he is. Dennis 2&cent; 13:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete GScholar indicates just a handful of citations. Even if there is something else that would meet WP:ACADEMIC, I agree with Dennis Brown that this is an unsalvageable CV-like mess. Nuke it. --Randykitty (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Randykitty. Does not seem to meet any sort of WP:N. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.