Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fooling April


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Fooling April

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominate for deletion Tagged for notability for over 6 years. Unreferenced blp. Can find no evidence of notability. Boleyn (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom., sources establish they exist but no evidence of notability.TheLongTone (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - have to agree at the moment. Even by their own admission they seem to have had little major success. I can't find anything of significance about them or their music that isn't self-published or blog-ish. Sionk (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. — Ed! (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.