Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foosh Energy Mints


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 13:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Foosh Energy Mints

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SPAM,. Was speedied deleted three times, once as WP:CSD and two times as WP:CSD SPAM advertising. Nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is one Part of a long history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia; -Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam--Hu12 (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2009 (
 * Speedy Delete: per G11 and WP:Snow as well as the deletion multiple times of related materials Vroom Foods and Buzz Bites This is a recreation of some of that material and just trying to get around the reason it's been deleted multiple times (blatant advertising). Ok after looking at the history more it just looks like we never caught this article. But still deserves to be deleted under the same rules Jamesofur (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and is blatantly promotional and inherently non-encyclopedic (until WP:RS says otherwise). Johnuniq (talk) 08:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per G11 and WP:Snow as Jamesofur notes above. It's just blatant spam. Geoff  TC 21:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.