Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football players transferred for over £10,000,000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    d elete. - Mailer Diablo 19:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Football players transferred for over £10,000,000

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This list is totally incomplete and possibly never will be, having received no constructive edits since the tail end of 2007. Furthermore, the fee of £10,000,000 is completely arbitrary, as no reason for that fee being chosen has been given, and it does not take exchange rates between the Pound sterling and various European currencies into account. Furthermore, the restriction that at least one English club must be involved in each transfer listed is not compliant with the title of the article. – PeeJay 10:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 10:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  10:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alexf42 10:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Jimbo[online] 12:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Number 57. --Angelo (talk) 12:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally arbitrary WP:IINFO, nuke it.  tomasz.  12:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Info already exists at Transfer (football). However the arbitrary cut-off point does not class it for deletion otherwise half the football FLs would also have to be listed. Peanut4 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment it does restrict the pool only to those players transferred over a certain amount, so the list is discriminate in that sense. Maybe lowering that number and using Euros would help. MuZemike (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What about the additional requirement that at least one English club must be involved in the deal? There must be tons of players transferred for over £10M where English clubs were not involved, so why the artificial Anglocentric constraint.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom. BountyHunter2008 (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (Quentin X (talk) 23:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.