Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football playing styles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Carioca (talk) 00:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Football playing styles

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very un-encyclopaedic article, full of original research and hugely open to subjective interpretation and debate. Might be of some use in a guidebook on soccer, but certainly not in an encyclopaedia Tx17777 (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Delete, article full of original research, partly a duplicate of Association football positions. --Angelo (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. The article is full of certain individual perceptions of what players are doing and the way they are doing it. Unlikely that readers, being individuals themselves, will benefit from opinions they do not hold themselves. Ref (chew) (do) 16:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  16:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman (talk) 18:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:OR Ban  Ray  22:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:OR, WP:POV, unencyclopedic cruft. Peanut4 (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Uncyclopedic, filled with original research, and probably has no ability as a subject to ever qualify to be on Wikipedia. Redphoenix526 (talk) 00:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and angelo. John Hayestalk 14:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 19:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.