Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Life (Isis Gee song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

For Life (Isis Gee song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent reliable sources indicate that the songe meets either WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - song has been performed twice as it made the final of the worlds biggest music competition on television. Perhaps some source of this could be added though.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Being performed at a notable competition does not make the song notable. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge Probably should be merged into her article with a redirect left behind. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It's already covered in her article so there's nothing to merge and the complex qualifier makes this a very unlikely search term. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 13:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep FFS it's a Eurovision entry that made the finals. Which means it was the one song picked that year to represent the country of Poland.  It then made it through the semi-final.  As such, making a Eurovision final is the equivalent of winning a fairly serious award (although normally goes to a different type of song).  On the other hand given that she sounds in my opinion like a Celine Dion knock-off and there's nationalism involved, the articles about her will be in Polish and published in Poland.  No, I don't speak Polish so can't find them. Neonchameleon (talk) 02:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Taking part in a notable contest gives a song notability for the fact that A) it qualified from the semi-finals; B) was performed in the finals; C) was viewed by over 125,000,000 people worldwide; and D) was on the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 compilation album. And I feel discomfort in the method the nominator replies back to everyone who has posted "keep" as if to force them to change their mind by dismissing their personal rationale for wanting to keep the article.    Wes     Mᴥuse   19:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The notability of the song contest does not and cannot impart notability to the songs performed in it. Nor does its presence on one album or another. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 02:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the way you hastily respond to everyone who "keeps", comes across as intimidating and pointy. You had your say at the time of nomination.  Please allow others their right to express their opinion and rationales, without intimidation.  Thank you.    Wes     Mᴥuse   04:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree. I'm not sure how appropriate it is for the nominator to respond to every non-agreeable 'vote'. While responding to guestions, etc. is acceptable, I thought the nominator was expected to leave the result up to the ones responding and to the closer. VMS Mosaic (talk) 08:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Somerhill Gallery was nominated for deletion on the same day as this for alleged "failure of WP:GNG" and was granted notability and the article only had 276 views. This song article has had twice as many views and is being questioned for notability?  Something seriously wrong in this world.    Wes     Mᴥuse   04:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.