Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Pete's Sake (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominated by now-blocked sockpuppeteer. If anyone wants to file a legitamate AfD, they are free to do so. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 20:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

For Pete's Sake (song)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability, if any, not yet established. Probably useless junk. Juvenile Deletionist 19:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable album track by a notable band. Non notable cover. Deletion Mutation  16:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Why is R. Stevie Moore non-notable? Rlendog (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Contrary to the claims above, at least one of the covers is notable and this is not "useless junk". Rlendog (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.