Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For the Sake of Mahdi (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. One keep !vote and no delete !vote other than nominator plus nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  05:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

For the Sake of Mahdi (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for film. Links in References are not in English, and so cannot be verified. One reference is to a database, another is to a non-independent source. Prof. Mc (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * English as a credible source is added to the film.Kalame10 (talk) 22:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Filmmaker:
 * In Arabic::
 * Actor:
 * in Arabic:
 * Actor:
 * In Arabic:
 * Actor:
 * In Arabic:
 * Actor:
 * in Arabic:
 * Actor:
 * in Arabic:
 * Short title:
 * In Arabic:
 * Short title 1:
 * Short title 2:
 * In Arabic:


 * Comment: I would urge thenominator to read WP:NONENG to understand that sources, specially for an Arabic film not released in the USA, need not be in English. And toward his inability read the sources, I would suggest he use one of the many translators available online, and perhaps WP:AGF that they verify the article as required unless able to show that they do not.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep We have Fars News and Farhang News and Payvand News and the film is written of AND sourced on the Persioan Wikipedia. We have valid sources, even if non-English.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Withdrawn by nominator Happy to withdraw this as per advice of.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.