Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For the love of Christ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 04:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

For the love of Christ

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unhelpful redirect to Wiktionary. AFreshStart (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. AFreshStart (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not a reason for deletion. Redirects to Wiktionary are common and are helpful. The subject is a very common phrase too. Neocorelight (Talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Redirects to wiktionary are useful when an article on the word or phrase is unlikely to be able to be made. It's a notable, common phrase, but not one that really merits discussion in article form, so wiktionary is a great fit. Fieari (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Redirects are usually nominated at WP:RfD. Daß Wölf 22:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , WP:Soft redirects are technically and ironically count as mainspace "article". Neocorelight (Talk) 03:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * See Soft redirect. Daß Wölf 14:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, you're right. I didn't see that. Neocorelight (Talk) 22:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, for the reasons of those who want to keep this redirect. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.