Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbes Magazine's List of The 20 Hottest Young Royals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Forbes Magazine's List of The 20 Hottest Young Royals

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete as WP:COPYVIO. This article contains no commentary. It is a simple reproduction of a subjective list created by the magazine for publication with the express purpose of selling magazines and as such is violation of their intellectual property. After Midnight 0001 21:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 100% agreement with nominator. This is just a reproduction of the list, not an article about the list. These types of lists are trivial, regardless of other media mentioning them.  I know that for the most part WP editors are not trying to rip anyone off but still we need to be careful about using copyrighted information without permission.  There are other articles about this kind of list that should also be deleted. -Steve Dufour (talk) 21:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If someone decides at a later date that the list itself is notable enough to warrant an article about the actual list, then that's a different matter. But, as pointed out above, this is just a reproduction of a list based on purely subjective opinions. CLW (talk) 08:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep; Not copyvio it is not a reproduction of the article, but essentially a mere summary table of contents saying who the people covered are, and giving our own pictures of them. Look at the article--it has much more content. A table of contents is not copyvio. All major Forbes lists are in my opinion notable.   DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.