Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Force pull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, allowing for redirect creation. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Force pull

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable force ability that could be mentioned in one sentence in the various articles on the force, does not assert any individual notability through multiple reliable sources, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to indicate independentAt www.dealcatcher.com/olive-garden-coupons notability for this plot element. As such, I support removal of the content, either by deleting and subsequent recreation as a redirect, or only a redirect. The redirect target should be Force power as the most applicable target article currently in existence. I believe that the Force power article should be redirected to Force (Star Wars) as it is an inappropriate article, but until any such action, it is the most appropriate place for the redirect. seresin wasn't he just...? 00:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge. Does not require AfD for this. DGG (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & Fantasy-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any useful information on this is already present at Force power. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Because the term "Force Pull" was not used in any of the films, those references all constitute original research. And, without that, there's not much left. I don't think this article can ever grow beyond stub status while meeting verifiability standards. *** Crotalus *** 04:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Force power per others. No need to keep a nonnotable OR-inviting permastub around forever. – sgeureka t•c 12:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Crotalus. Barring a reliable source that canonizes this expression, it should not be a redirect. -Verdatum (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.