Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forcefield Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Forcefield Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising and fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 19:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's not advertising and does not fails notability. Notable artists and notable distributors. May need references and expansion, but still notable. --Bdboyc (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited. The notability of their artists or distributor has no influence on the notability of the label. The Banner talk 22:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Needs more references, but still notable for their large catalog. Bdboyc (talk) 03:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * As stated before: the artists signed by the label have no influence on the notability. It is the label itself that has to prove notability. The Banner talk 08:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * delete - Basically per nom's reply. Notability is not inherited.  The vast majority of blue linked bands are to disambig pages.  Only two go to actual bands, which seem to be of marginal notability themselves.  There are no reliable independent sources about the record label, therefore the article fails the WP:GNG requirements.  Sailsbystars (talk) 02:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No third-party reliable sources with non-trivial coverage; notability is not inherited from a few marginally bands. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.