Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fore School of Management (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  02:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Fore School of Management
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This was closed as non-consensus in past. But I want to open it again for a proper discussion. It was suggested that this is a not-for-profit organisation and hence WP:CORPDEPTH is not applicable. But it is not true. Check Business Standard a very WP:RS that explains the situation. NGO status is only a front and such private institutions are essentially profit making. There were two sources presented in last AFD. The telegraph source is written by an alumni so can’t be WP:INDEPENDENT. The BS news is a PTI feed. Also, this BS news link is not entirely focused on FORE. It uses the FORE incident as a premise to highlight the overall issue. Frankly, discussion about FORE in this is minimal. So I don’t think that is a significant source either. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 07:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies,  and Education. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete None of the coverage explains why this school is significant or notable. All run of the mill coverages. Doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a for-profit company therefore WP:NCORP applies. None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.