Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fore school of management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Fore school of management

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It was said in the article it is a B School, and the only link is the official website. Is this article really notable? LAA Fan sign review 05:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 'B School' is shorthand for business school; not a second rate institution compared to an 'A School' :-) TerriersFan (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * delete doesn't look notable to me. - UtherSRG (talk) 06:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliable third party sources are uncovered. While the Google test has issues, the fact that a search doesn't bring forward anything other than directory listings and the official site on the first several pages does not suggest that those sources will be easily found. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - post-graduate degree-awarding institutions are notable. However, as can be seen here, there are sources attesting to the notability that meets WP:ORG. This page needs a clean not deletion. Indian institutions cannot be expected to have the same depth of coverage on the web as those in anglosphere do, and we need to avoid systemic bias and look for local sources. I would add that this was nominated two minutes after editing finished, which is unacceptable. I should like to hear from the nominator how he/she carried out the WP:BEFORE processes in that time? TerriersFan (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 21:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep A degree granting college of higher education always gets an article, if existence can be demonstrated. The present article is not spammy. "doesn't look notable to me": is a non-argument. And there seem to be clear sources for ntability. It is well to put them in when writing, but also to search before nominating for deletion. DGG (talk) 03:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. As TerriersFan indicates, postgraduate degree-awarding institutions are notable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is notable. NonvocalScream (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.