Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forehead advertising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Forehead advertising

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Recommended for deletion as per WP:NPOV. This is clearly an advertisement Unexplainedbacon 14:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, if not speedy delete per WP:CSD. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 14:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete While this phenomenon is mildly notable, the article in its current state is pure spam Corpx 17:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I reverted the page to an earlier revision, which is in much better shape, so changing my position to Neutral based on that now. Corpx 17:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge into Human billboard; although much-improved by the reversion, there is not really much content for a stand-alone article. EyeSereneTALK 19:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This was quite notable a few years ago, and will become part of the history of advertising as an example of what happens when you can no longer generate publicity. After the first few times, when other people spent a month with words written on their heads, it had gone from "novel" and "original" to "dumb" and "derivative"... and thus a lousy investment of advertising dollars. Mandsford 04:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a notable topic. A Google search returns many reliable sources about the phenomenon.  --musicpvm 04:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is clearly not an advertisement, as the company involved is defunct. Beorhtric 16:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.