Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign workers in Kuwait


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Foreign workers in Kuwait

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I declined the speedy deletion as copyvio per StateDept and also the speedy deletion for notability because it's not a person, company or website; but I think the tagger was probably right that this article needs work to survive. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I deleted the link to HRW.org. It took you to a page that asked for donations, and had a link to "documents", giving the impression that this text was theirs; it isn't, it's public domain. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The corresponding piece of StateDept is called "Human trafficking", not "foreign workers", hence wrong subject. Furthermore, this page is not an encyclopedic entry: it has no factual material, no dates, no references, just general statement that Kuwait sucks in this respect. CIA may collect and distribute their info as they with, but in wikipedia there is a commons sense of what constitutes an encyclopedic entry. "Public domain" and "American Gov't" is not a ticket to wikipedia.  Wikipedia is not a mirror of .gov domain. - 7-bubёn >t 20:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unreferenced, non-encyclopedic and mislabeled article. Wikipedia is not a mirror site for govt reports.  Not seeing anything worth keeping here.--Rtphokie (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.