Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensic osteology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Forensic osteology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The information stated in forensic osteology describes the role of forensic anthropology. The two disciplines are one in the same. In addition, the stub is unlikely to be further expanded upon and has existed in its current state for years. --Stabila711 (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  15:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator After thinking about it for awhile it would probably be better if the article was merged and a redirect was left instead of a flat out deletion. The article has 3 out of the 4 reasons for a merger (overlap, text, and context) so that is probably the best option. --Stabila711 (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.